Trump Handed Big Win From Judge

By: Alec Donaldson | Last updated: Oct 22, 2023

Former President Donald Trump celebrated a “complete victory” following a federal judge’s decision on Tuesday, barring plaintiffs from pursuing a class action lawsuit against him.

Trump's Endorsement Arrangement

In her order denying the class action lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield, based in New York City, recounted Trump’s endorsement arrangement with ACN Opportunity LLC in 2006.

This arrangement was aimed at promoting the marketing training services provided to independent business owners by ACN.

A series of agreements stemming from this endorsement continued until June 2015, the same month when Trump declared his candidacy for the presidential election.

Advertisement

Source: Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Advertisement

Plaintiff Claims

Within the lawsuit, three plaintiffs contended Trump’s endorsement persuaded them to purchase ACN’s products.

Two of these individuals claimed they did not earn any profits from their involvement, while another stated she had made only $38 over two years.

Advertisement

Source: depositphotos

Various Factors Involved

The plaintiffs further alleged that they were unaware of the fact that Trump received millions of dollars for endorsing ACN.

Judge Schofield determined that defining a class of individuals who had suffered harm due to Trump’s endorsement would be unfeasible.

This difficulty arose from the fact that various factors could influence individuals, including their independent research into the company, other marketing materials, and the recommendations of other people.

Advertisement

Source: depositphotos

Testimonials And Examples

“The majority of the content on the Opportunity Discs [promoting the company] featured testimonials from various successful IBOs, highlighting how ACN has enabled them to have, for example, a relaxed work life, expensive cars, and large homes,” the judge said.

Advertisement

Source: AndreyPopov/iStock

Raising Questions

“The nature of Trump’s alleged misstatements also raises individual questions of whether any given putative class member believed the statements and therefore relied on them,” Schofield added.

Source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Advertisement

Another Observation

She further pointed out that “the record evidence shows that some IBOs knew or assumed Trump was a paid spokesperson.”

Source: Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Advertisement

Statements Made By Trump

Furthermore, the statements made by Trump regarding ACN, such as it being a “great opportunity” and having a “winning business model” with a “proven track record” of “creating millionaires,” may be perceived as standard advertising puffery rather than outright misrepresentations.

Source: Scott Olson/Getty Images

Advertisement

No Separate Claims

Alongside rejecting the establishment of a class action lawsuit, Judge Schofield instructed the three plaintiffs to provide briefs by Tuesday, outlining reasons why their claims should not be separated from the rest and transferred as individual cases to the relevant district courts in California, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, where they reside.

Source: iStock

Advertisement

'No Class Action'

Trump responded to the judge’s ruling on Truth Social, stating, “Today we had a Total and Complete Victory against Far Left Lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, on her ridiculous ACN Class Action Suit, yet another Election Interference Case.”

“It was ruled that there can be no Class Action, and Certification was denied!” he added.

Source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Advertisement

Defamation Civil Suit

Roberta Kaplan had previously represented E. Jean Carroll in her defamation civil suit against Trump in May, in which her client alleged that Trump had raped her in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

Source: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Advertisement

Denied Knowing E. Jean Carroll

The former president vehemently denied knowing Carroll, and in his closing argument in May, Trump’s attorney, Joe Tacopina, asserted that Carroll’s story was a fabricated work of fiction.

Tacopina contended that the legal team representing Carroll aimed to generate antipathy towards Trump – enough to overlook the factual details.

Source: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Advertisement